Toronto Metropolitan University's Independent Student Newspaper Since 1967

The Egerton Ryerson statue. FILE PHOTOThe Egerton Ryerson statue. FILE PHOTO
The Egerton Ryerson statue (FILE PHOTO)
All News

Yes, Egerton Ryerson helped create the residential school system

By Jacob Dubé

Critics say a column published Wednesday in The Globe and Mail undercuts Egerton Ryerson’s role in the creation of the residential school system in Canada.

The writer, University of Calgary history professor Donald Smith, argues that Ryerson wasn’t anti-Indigenous because he had a good relationship with the Mississaugas of New Credit and he didn’t create the residential-school system—he only wrote a report in 1847 about Indigenous boarding schools for adults.

“Don Smith has definitely done some work on this, but that piece obscures a lot of Ryerson’s legacy and the contribution he made to designing the residential school system in Canada,” said Ryerson University advisor to the dean of arts on Indigenous education Hayden King, who is Gchi’mnissing Anishinaabe. “It was condescending to students, patronizing to the Ryerson community to assume that we had not done our research and not known who Ryerson was. This attempt to rescue Egerton Ryerson was really disingenuous.”

King refers to Ryerson’s 1847 report on page 73 of “Statistics respecting Indian Schools” in which Ryerson recommends the creation of schools where Indigenous peoples work for a couple hours a day and take English and religion classes.

“He cites an average length of time for students at residential schools to be between four and eight years, which of course indicates he was not talking about adults, but children,” King says.

This report was used to implement and refine the residential school system that operated in Canada for over 100 years.

Ryerson was Ontario’s chief superintendent of schools from 1842 to 1876. In his position of authority he created his report and continuously advocated for Indigenous children to be educated separately from white children at boarding schools away from their families.

“He believed that we didn’t deserve the same type of education, that we deserved a different type of education. One that was essentially the residential school system, that only went to grade three and that was for the purpose of training future exploited labour workers who were Indigenous,” said Sarah Dennis, a member of Ryerson’s Indigenous Students’ Association.

Dennis says he didn’t have a hand in the actual operations of these schools, but it was his theories that paved the way for those institutions to be created.

King said that though Ryerson did have good relationships with some Indigenous peoples, they were primarily Christian Mississaugas who embraced the religious conversion.


“Certainly Ryerson had friendships among Methodist and Anglican Indigenous people, but that does not excuse the tremendous harm he did to people who rejected his views and rejected that philosophy of education and rejected the very notion of residential schools,” said King.

“This column gives them an opportunity to ignore calls to critically reflect on Ryerson’s legacy and his history,” King said. “It really provides a cover. It’s a move to innocence for people who refuse to engage in the discussion.”


Ryerson University has published several statements acknowledging Egerton Ryerson’s involvement and has committed to “respectful relationships with Aboriginal communities.”


  1. W. Tobias

    This is a well written story. thank you for helping clarify some of the history on this issue.

    • Allbwell

      This is a poorly written article! In the very middle, where Ryerson’s ratonale should be explained, there’s a quoted insert by an Indigenous woman who in her own words interprets the rationale. This gives the impression that Ryerson’s statements were false or racist without even quoting them. It’s literary piracy at its worst and it’s reported here as fact when it is only one woman’s, a biased woman’s opinion.
      It holds that there may be more to this history – but this story is wrongly presented. Scold your writer and fire your editor.

  2. Tom Thorne

    What a lot of politically correct nonsense. Egerton Ryerson and his times needs historical context not self righteous propaganda. Of course Egerton Ryerson’s times were much different from the present when he was building public education in what became Ontario. Please notice that treaty indigenous people in this country still have their education controlled by the federal government with funding levels much lower than public and Catholic schools funded by Ontario and the other provinces. Consider the fact that Egerton Ryerson actually examined how Indigenous people could receive education in a changing Upper Canada. That in my view is something to be praised. At any rate I am against changing my University’s name. Ryerson University fittingly celebrates a person who worked hard to build public education. In addition, we have all worked hard to build the Ryerson brand and this kind of nonsense reduces that work. Tom Thorne (RTA68)

  3. Rachel

    What’s is sad about this is that I ended up here trying to chase info that was totally overlooked in an article from the National Post about the statue. And I was there in the first place because finding out our Ministry of transport, Laurie Scott, had a ProudBoy (from 2017 at least seen on Twitter and Scaffold) supporter as an advisor until yesterday Feb 11, 2021! But the National Post quoted that same guy who was just working with our Ontario government days ago who said ““At the end of the day, I think it’s because these are people who know they’ll never do anything great enough to have a statue erected of themselves,” said Darbyshire” He was referring to the Bipoc protesters. And that’s why statues and plaques matter so much. The comments below that article trying to evade Ryerson’s history there were racist sympathetic.

    • JL

      Egerton Ryersons 1847 report was not published for almost 50 years and 16 years after his death.. please read it…

  4. M

    I think it’s also important to look at things in more detail and context. If you’re interested in learning more about Egerton and the motives and reasoning behind the residential schools–I suggest taking the time to read this article:

  5. Peter N Moogk

    It is terrifying that a misinformed mob in Toronto, which defaced and toppled Ryerson’s statue, should redefine our past. Even worse, is that some academics, who are better informed, would either acquiesce to their viewpoint or remain silent. The Rev. Ryerson was a provincial superintendent of schools in Ontario and a few of his ideas about aboriginal education, such as segregated schools, were incorporated into the federal government’s provisions for Indian residential schools. Ryerson did believe in compulsory public schooling for all children in Ontario and with a Christian and British imprint – a standard viewpoint in nineteenth century Canada. Making him culpable for the federal system of Indian residential schools run by churches as, they developed, is an illogical leap. If you want a villain who really deserves blame, try Duncan Campbell Scott of the federal Department of Indian Affairs. Topple his memorials if you can find them.

  6. Jessica

    Here’s the link to the article written by Professor Donald Smith again. There’s a lot in his Globe and Mail article that this “eye-opening” article here seems to have “overlooked”. If Mr. Egerton Ryerson were still alive, I’m sure he would respond to the emotional outcries, which are very valid. Who knows. However, trying to “overlook” and therefore downplay his good deeds in order to validate the hurt we feel today, thereby scapegoating this man for all that happened… I would call that disingenuous.

    There’s a lot of violence going on today, cancel culture being an example. Does cancelling what happened make it better? Do anger and violence heal? Let’s look deeper into the facts, and work on truly healing – a long process that will take much discussion, cooperation and love – before we start defacing our city. I very much doubt that real Indigenous spirituality would ever have us do this, and I very much respect our TRUE Indigenous Heritage. Let’s bring out the good.

  7. John Morris

    It is the Catholic nuns and priests who are responsible for the treatment of native children in residential schools. Not Ryerson. Someone please show me
    In a letter from Ryerson where he writes,

    “..We must drive the indigenous culture from these native peoples. Beat, whip, torture. Drive the savage soul and culture from these children…..”

    Even if Ryerson was the architect of Residential schools. Which he is not. Mr. Ryerson was not responsible for the abuse.

  8. Anita Dermer

    The elephant and the blind Brahmins! Have all the people attacking Ryerson spent hours in reference rooms reading what he actually wrote? Is it true, for example, as maintains that he called for 8 to 12 hours of daily agricultural work for Indigenous children from the age of four? Or are those historians correct who say he actually recommended a curriculum including reading, writing, arithmetic, bookkeeping, agricultural chemistry, history and geography along with actual agricultural work for older Indigenous children who wished to enrol? Was his intent to create a pool of workers who could be exploited, or was he hoping to train these children for the realities of the agricultural economy in which they lived? Some of today’s “researchers” seem to think he should have focused on ensuring that Indigenous children got a thorough grounding in STEM subjects so they could presumably seek employment in Silicon Valley! Let’s have some footnotes, fellows — specific book titles, page numbers and names of libraries holding this material.

Leave a Reply