Toronto Metropolitan University's Independent Student Newspaper Since 1967

The Egerton Ryerson statue. FILE PHOTOThe Egerton Ryerson statue. FILE PHOTO
The Egerton Ryerson statue (FILE PHOTO)
All Campus News News

Ryerson is discussing the possibility of removing the Egerton Ryerson statue

By Jacob Dubé

Ryerson University had a meeting this month to discuss the possibility of removing the statue of Egerton Ryerson from campus, provided it is moved to another location.

Though no actions are currently confirmed or planned, the university had not previously officially discussed this possibility until the meeting on April 4.

“Our Office met with three Indigenous students today to discuss their concerns. One of the items they talked about was the impact of the Egerton Ryerson statue. They shared their thoughts about the possibility of a replacement, however at this time there are no plans to remove the statue,” wrote the office of Denise O’Neil Green, Ryerson’s vice-president equity and community inclusion, in a statement.

Also in the meeting was Ryerson Students’ Union (RSU) vice-president equity Camryn Harlick, Monica McKay, Ryerson’s director of Aboriginal initiatives, CESAR vice-president equity and campaigns Phyllis McKenna, as well as Ryerson social work student Sarah Dennis.

“It was really relieving to hear about alternative solutions for the statue,” said Dennis, though she mentioned that celebrations should be saved for when the statue is actually moved. “There are folks at the top who are happy to listen and take on the work that comes from the reaction of students. It was definitely a collective effort that made it possible.”

On Canada Day, the RSU published a list of demands regarding Indigenous justice on campus, including the removal of the statue of Egerton Ryerson, who helped create Canada’s residential school system, as well as changing the name of the university.

In November, the university agreed to most of the demands, including the creation of an Indigenous language course, the education of public servants on the history of Aboriginal Peoples and the history of residential schooling, an annual pow wow and a research program with multi-year funding to advance the understanding of reconciliation. The administration never officially rejected the statue removal and name change, and another meeting to discuss it was to be scheduled at a later date.

In January, Ryerson released its community consultation report addressing how to implement the Truth and Reconciliation report’s recommendations. It didn’t mention removing the statue, but rather suggested adding a plaque explaining the historical context of Egerton Ryerson’s actions.

“I feel like the university really listened to what students were asking for and recognised that the plaque wasn’t enough,” Harlick said. “I was very happy to see that these next steps were taken.”

According to Harlick, a committee consisting of himself, McKenna and Dennis is tasked with finding a potential place to move the statue, but he said the university is also willing to help. Harlick suggested donating it to a historical society or possibly turning the statue into a bust and putting it in the archives.

Harlick said they also discussed what would replace the statue in its current location, like an Indigenous art installation or a medicine garden.

 

 

 

 

3 Comments

  1. A Student

    THIS IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULES! SO DISRESPECTFUL TO THE SCHOOL!

    • Julia Lloyd

      I think it’s disrespectful that Egerton Ryerson thought it was okay to destroy the indigenous culture? Read up on your history. Times are changing and Ryerson doesn’t need to keep a statue that offends so many of our students just by being on campus.

  2. Ian Wishart

    Egerton Ryerson was appointed as Superintendent of the Common Schools of Upper Canada in 1844. He estalished a system which provided free education for all children, “rich or poor, citizen or alien”. He did not establish residential schools. He did not destroy indigenous Culture. He retired from office in 1876. A statue in his honour was erected in 1889. He deserved the honour, and should not be doused in red paint.

    Ian Wishart

Leave a Reply to Cancel reply